Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT295
Utility
- power
- 44.2 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT295 vs Renault 50-12 LB
RenaultModel B
Renault 50-12 LB
Utility
- power
- 44.3 hp
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT295
vs
RenaultRenault 50-12 LB
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 50-12 LB higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)MT29544.2 hp
50-12 LB44.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT295 is in the 38th percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 50-12 LB higher · +39 ci (+29%)MT295134 ci
50-12 LB173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT295 is in the 32nd percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT295 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2954
50-12 LB3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT295 is in the 50th percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT295 higher · +8 (+100%)MT29516
50-12 LB8
Median Utility Tractor12
MT295 is in the 73rd percentile; 50-12 LB is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT295 (A)50-12 LB (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Renault | — |
| Model | MT295 | 50-12 LB | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F3 L 912 | — |
| Power Output | 44.2hp | 44.3hp | ▲ 50-12 LB+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ MT295+150 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ MT295+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 134ci | 173ci | ▲ 50-12 LB+39 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.9in | ▲ 50-12 LB+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 4.7in | ▲ 50-12 LB+1.1 in · +31% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 141in | 130in | ▲ MT295+11 in · +8% |
| Width | 71.5in | 64.6in | ▲ MT295+6.9 in · +11% |
| Height | 95.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,277lb | 4,630lb | ▲ 50-12 LB+353 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.5-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 13.6-28 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | I | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,600lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT295 | Renault 50-12 LB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 32nd percentile (134 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)B · 44th percentile (4,630 lb)
A · MT295B · 50-12 LBMedian Utility Tractor