Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT295B
Utility
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT295B vs Massey Ferguson 1552
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1552
Utility
- power
- 52 hp
- displacement
- 180 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT295B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1552
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT295B higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)MT295B52.1 hp
155252 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT295B is in the 48th percentile; 1552 is in the 47th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT295B180 ci
1552180 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT295B is in the 49th percentile; 1552 is in the 49th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT295B4
15524
Median Utility Tractor4
MT295B is in the 50th percentile; 1552 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1552 higher · +4 (+50%)MT295B8
155212
Median Utility Tractor12
MT295B is in the 23rd percentile; 1552 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MT295B (A)1552 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT295B | 1552 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | E4DD | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 52.1hp | 52hp | ▲ MT295B+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT295B+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 180ci | 180ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.8in | 3.8in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShuttle | SynchroShuttle | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | 133in | Same |
| Width | 65.4in | 66.1in | ▲ 1552+0.7 in · +1% |
| Height | 89.1in | 90.7in | ▲ 1552+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,726lb | 3,663lb | ▲ MT295B+63 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three Point Hitch | Cat I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,086lb | 3,483lb | ▲ 1552+397 lb · +13% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT295B | Massey Ferguson 1552 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | 2gal | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (52.1 hp)B · 47th percentile (52 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (180 ci)B · 49th percentile (180 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,726 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,663 lb)
A · MT295BB · 1552Median Utility Tractor