Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT315B
Utility
- power
- 58 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT315B vs McCormick Intl C60 Max
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C60 Max
Utility
- power
- 58.5 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT315B
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C60 Max
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ C60 Max higher · +0.5 hp (<1%)MT315B58 hp
C60 Max58.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT315B is in the 52nd percentile; C60 Max is in the 52nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT315B201 ci
C60 Max201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT315B is in the 55th percentile; C60 Max is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT315B3
C60 Max3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT315B is in the 23rd percentile; C60 Max is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ C60 Max higher · +12 (+100%)MT315B12
C60 Max24
Median Utility Tractor12
MT315B is in the 50th percentile; C60 Max is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
MT315B (A)C60 Max (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | MT315B | C60 Max | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1103C-33 | — |
| Power Output | 58hp | 58.5hp | ▲ C60 Max+0.5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ C60 Max+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 201ci | 201ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized Shuttle / Power Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 158in | ▲ C60 Max+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 76in | 64.2in | ▲ MT315B+11.8 in · +18% |
| Height | Not recorded | 84.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 6,570lb | ▲ MT315B+44 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT315B | McCormick Intl C60 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab / ROPS available | Open/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58 hp)B · 52nd percentile (58.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,570 lb)
A · MT315BB · C60 MaxMedian Utility Tractor