Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT325B
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT325B vs Kubota M7040
KubotaModel B
Kubota M7040
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT325B
vs
KubotaKubota M7040
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT325B68 hp
M704068 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT325B is in the 61st percentile; M7040 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M7040 higher · +2 ci (<1%)MT325B201 ci
M7040203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT325B is in the 55th percentile; M7040 is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ M7040 higher · +1 (+33%)MT325B3
M70404
Median Utility Tractor4
MT325B is in the 23rd percentile; M7040 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT325B higher · +4 (+50%)MT325B12
M70408
Median Utility Tractor12
MT325B is in the 50th percentile; M7040 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT325B (A)M7040 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT325B | M7040 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | V3307-DI | — |
| Power Output | 68hp | 68hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M7040+450 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ M7040+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 203ci | ▲ M7040+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.7in | ▲ MT325B+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT325B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76in | 73.2in | ▲ MT325B+2.8 in · +4% |
| Height | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 4,190lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet discs | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Kubota M7040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (with ROPS) | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 61st percentile (68 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Width
median 66 inA · 73rd percentile (76 in)B · 68th percentile (73.2 in)
A · MT325BB · M7040Median Utility Tractor