Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT325B
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT325B vs Massey Ferguson 3625
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 3625
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT325B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3625
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT325B68 hp
362568 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT325B is in the 61st percentile; 3625 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT325B201 ci
3625201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT325B is in the 55th percentile; 3625 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT325B3
36253
Median Utility Tractor4
MT325B is in the 23rd percentile; 3625 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT325B higher · +4 (+50%)MT325B12
36258
Median Utility Tractor12
MT325B is in the 50th percentile; 3625 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
MT325B (A)3625 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT325B | 3625 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | AGCO SisuDiesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 33 DT | — |
| Power Output | 68hp | 68hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,150RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 3625+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 201ci | 201ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 3625+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT325B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized shuttle | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 148in | Same |
| Width | 76in | 76in | Same |
| Height | 105in | 99in | ▲ MT325B+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 6,614lb | 5,071lb | ▲ MT325B+1,543 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electro-hydraulic wet disc clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II/I | — |
| Hitch Category | I/II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 5,515lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT325B | Massey Ferguson 3625 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (with ROPS) | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 61st percentile (68 hp)B · 61st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (201 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)B · 48th percentile (5,071 lb)
A · MT325BB · 3625Median Utility Tractor