ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT425 vs Massey Ferguson 294
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 294
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT425
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 294
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 294 higher · +5 ci (+2%)MT425243 ci
294248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT425 is in the 67th percentile; 294 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT4254
2944
Median Utility Tractor4
MT425 is in the 50th percentile; 294 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT425 higher · +12 (+100%)MT42524
29412
Median Utility Tractor12
MT425 is in the 92nd percentile; 294 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 294 higher · +538 lb (+9%)MT4256,182 lb
2946,720 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT425 is in the 58th percentile; 294 is in the 64th · 5,107 models
MT425 (A)294 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT425 | 294 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 3054 | A4.248 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT425+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 243ci | 248ci | ▲ 294+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4in | ▲ 294+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 24-speed power shuttle | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 77in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,182lb | 6,720lb | ▲ 294+538 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4x24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4x30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT425 | Massey Ferguson 294 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 67th percentile (243 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)B · 64th percentile (6,720 lb)
A · MT425B · 294Median Utility Tractor