Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT425B
Utility
- power
- 81.1 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT425B vs Massey Ferguson 2660 HD
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 2660 HD
Utility
- power
- 81 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT425B
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 2660 HD
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT425B higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)MT425B81.1 hp
2660 HD81 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT425B is in the 72nd percentile; 2660 HD is in the 72nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2660 HD higher · +1 ci (<1%)MT425B268 ci
2660 HD269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT425B is in the 75th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 78th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT425B4
2660 HD4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT425B is in the 50th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT425B higher · +3,117 lb (+56%)MT425B8,695 lb
2660 HD5,578 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT425B is in the 80th percentile; 2660 HD is in the 52nd · 5,107 models
MT425B (A)2660 HD (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT425B | 2660 HD | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | Perkins | — |
| Model | U0903BB5 | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 81.1hp | 81hp | ▲ MT425B+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 269ci | ▲ 2660 HD+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator-controlled power shift | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 155in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 79.1in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,695lb | 5,578lb | ▲ MT425B+3,117 lb · +56% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 15.6gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,235psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 55.7hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16x7.5 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 34x18.4 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | Massey Ferguson 2660 HD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (81.1 hp)B · 72nd percentile (81 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 78th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,695 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,578 lb)
A · MT425BB · 2660 HDMedian Utility Tractor