Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT425B
Utility
- power
- 81.1 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT425B vs New Holland T5060
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T5060
Utility
- power
- 94.4 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT425B
vs
New HollandNew Holland T5060
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T5060 higher · +13.3 hp (+16%)MT425B81.1 hp
T506094.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT425B is in the 72nd percentile; T5060 is in the 80th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T5060 higher · +6 ci (+2%)MT425B268 ci
T5060274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT425B is in the 75th percentile; T5060 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT425B4
T50604
Median Utility Tractor4
MT425B is in the 50th percentile; T5060 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT425B higher · +240 lb (+3%)MT425B8,695 lb
T50608,455 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT425B is in the 80th percentile; T5060 is in the 79th · 5,107 models
MT425B (A)T5060 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT425B | T5060 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | CNH Diesel | — |
| Model | U0903BB5 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 81.1hp | 94.4hp | ▲ T5060+13.3 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ T5060+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 274ci | ▲ T5060+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator-controlled power shift | 12 SPEED | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 92.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,695lb | 8,455lb | ▲ MT425B+240 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 15.6gpm | 17.7gpm | ▲ T5060+2.1 gpm · +13% |
| Pressure | 2,235psi | 2,255psi | ▲ T5060+20 psi · <1% |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
| Power Rating | 55.7hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16x7.5 | 10:00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 34x18.4 | 600/65R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT425B | New Holland T5060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (81.1 hp)B · 80th percentile (94.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,695 lb)B · 79th percentile (8,455 lb)
A · MT425BB · T5060Median Utility Tractor