Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT445B
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT445B vs McCormick Intl CX90
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX90
Utility
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT445B
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT445B higher · +2 hp (+2%)MT445B85 hp
CX9083 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT445B is in the 75th percentile; CX90 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT445B268 ci
CX90268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT445B is in the 75th percentile; CX90 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT445B4
CX904
Median Utility Tractor4
MT445B is in the 50th percentile; CX90 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CX90 higher · +8 (+50%)MT445B16
CX9024
Median Utility Tractor12
MT445B is in the 73rd percentile; CX90 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
MT445B (A)CX90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | MT445B | CX90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | Perkins | — |
| Model | 1104C | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 83hp | ▲ MT445B+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 268ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four Speed Power Shift | Power shuttle, Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 166in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 92.3in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,630lb | 8,466lb | ▲ MT445B+164 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 320/85R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 420/85R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT445B | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,630 lb)B · 79th percentile (8,466 lb)
A · MT445BB · CX90Median Utility Tractor