ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT455B
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT455B vs McCormick Intl X10.90M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.90M
Utility
- power
- 91.2 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT455B
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.90M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT455B higher · +3.8 hp (+4%)MT455B95 hp
X10.90M91.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT455B is in the 81st percentile; X10.90M is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.90M higher · +1 ci (<1%)MT455B268 ci
X10.90M269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT455B is in the 75th percentile; X10.90M is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT455B4
X10.90M4
Median Utility Tractor4
MT455B is in the 50th percentile; X10.90M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT455B16
X10.90M16
Median Utility Tractor12
MT455B is in the 73rd percentile; X10.90M is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT455B (A)X10.90M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | MT455B | X10.90M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | Perkins | — |
| Model | 1104C | D1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 91.2hp | ▲ MT455B+3.8 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 269ci | ▲ X10.90M+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator controlled powershift | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 162in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 77.8in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,885lb | 8,905lb | ▲ X10.90M+20 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD and FWA | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD or FWA | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT455B | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open ROPS or Closed Center Load Sensing (Cab) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 79th percentile (91.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,885 lb)B · 81st percentile (8,905 lb)
A · MT455BB · X10.90MMedian Utility Tractor