ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT465B
Utility
- power
- 103 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT465B vs Cub Cadet 7000
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet 7000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger MT465B
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT465B higher · +83 hp (+415%)MT465B103 hp
700020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT465B is in the 84th percentile; 7000 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT465B higher · +199 ci (+291%)MT465B268 ci
700068.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT465B is in the 75th percentile; 7000 is in the 9th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT465B higher · +1 (+33%)MT465B4
70003
Median Utility Tractor4
MT465B is in the 50th percentile; 7000 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT465B higher · +10 (+167%)MT465B16
70006
Median Utility Tractor12
MT465B is in the 73rd percentile; 7000 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
MT465B (A)7000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | MT465B | 7000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 1104C | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 103hp | 20hp | ▲ MT465B+83 hp · +415% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 7000+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ MT465B+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 268ci | 68.6ci | ▲ MT465B+199 ci · +291% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.1in | ▲ MT465B+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.1in | ▲ MT465B+1.9 in · +61% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator controlled powershift | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 169in | 107in | ▲ MT465B+62 in · +58% |
| Width | 101in | 46.3in | ▲ MT465B+54.7 in · +118% |
| Height | 109in | 78.9in | ▲ MT465B+30.1 in · +38% |
| Operating Weight | 10,105lb | 1,837lb | ▲ MT465B+8,268 lb · +450% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 7,285lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT465B | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open and Closed options available | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (103 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 9th percentile (68.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 86th percentile (10,105 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,837 lb)
A · MT465BB · 7000Median Utility Tractor