Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT465E
Agricultural
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT465E vs Challenger MT475D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT475D
Row Crop
- power
- 123 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT465E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT475D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT475D higher · +8 hp (+7%)MT465E115 hp
MT475D123 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT465E is in the 53rd percentile; MT475D is in the 58th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT465E299 ci
MT475D299 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT465E is in the 46th percentile; MT475D is in the 46th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT465E4
MT475D4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT465E is in the 31st percentile; MT475D is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT475D higher · +333 lb (+2%)MT465E15,432 lb
MT475D15,765 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT465E is in the 72nd percentile; MT475D is in the 73rd · 971 models
MT465E (A)MT475D (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT465E | MT475D | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | AGCO Power | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 49AWI | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 123hp | ▲ MT475D+8 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT475D+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 299ci | 299ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four-speed power shift | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with two mechanical ranges | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 72in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,432lb | 15,765lb | ▲ MT475D+333 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 580/70R38 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 52.8in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 52.8in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 52.8" to 87.8" | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 52.8" to 87.8" | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | III/II | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Multiple wet disc, hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT465E | Challenger MT475D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 53rd percentile (115 hp)B · 58th percentile (123 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 46th percentile (299 ci)B · 46th percentile (299 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 72nd percentile (15,432 lb)B · 73rd percentile (15,765 lb)
A · MT465EB · MT475DMedian Agricultural Tractor