Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT475B
Utility
- power
- 124 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT475B vs Fendt Farmer 311
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 311
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 380 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 21
ChallengerChallenger MT475B
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 311
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT475B higher · +9 hp (+8%)MT475B124 hp
Farmer 311115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT475B is in the 90th percentile; Farmer 311 is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT475B higher · +22 ci (+6%)MT475B402 ci
Farmer 311380 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT475B is in the 90th percentile; Farmer 311 is in the 89th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT475B6
Farmer 3116
Median Utility Tractor4
MT475B is in the 93rd percentile; Farmer 311 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 311 higher · +5 (+31%)MT475B16
Farmer 31121
Median Utility Tractor12
MT475B is in the 73rd percentile; Farmer 311 is in the 88th · 4,941 models
MT475B (A)Farmer 311 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT475B | Farmer 311 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | MWM | — |
| Model | C6.6 | D226.B6 | — |
| Power Output | 124hp | 115hp | ▲ MT475B+9 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmer 311+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 380ci | ▲ MT475B+22 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT475B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (4) range operator controlled powershift | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 190in | 175in | ▲ MT475B+15 in · +9% |
| Width | 79.3in | 91.3in | ▲ Farmer 311+12 in · +15% |
| Height | 110in | 111in | ▲ Farmer 311+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 11,795lb | 11,466lb | ▲ MT475B+329 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center and closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear: 540/750/1000 | Front: 1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 750rpm | — |
| Speed 3 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT475B | Fendt Farmer 311 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 90th percentile (124 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 89th percentile (380 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (11,795 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,466 lb)
A · MT475BB · Farmer 311Median Utility Tractor