Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT475E
Utility
- power
- 132 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT475E vs Fendt 716
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 716
Agricultural
- power
- 162 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT475E
vs
FendtFendt 716
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 716 higher · +30 hp (+23%)MT475E132 hp
716162 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT475E is in the 91st percentile; 716 is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 716 higher · +71 ci (+24%)MT475E299 ci
716370 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT475E is in the 84th percentile; 716 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 716 higher · +2 (+50%)MT475E4
7166
Median Utility Tractor4
MT475E is in the 50th percentile; 716 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT475E higher · +2,248 lb (+15%)MT475E16,810 lb
71614,562 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT475E is in the 94th percentile; 716 is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
MT475E (A)716 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT475E | 716 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 716 | — |
| Power Output | 132hp | 162hp | ▲ 716+30 hp · +23% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 716+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 370ci | ▲ 716+71 ci · +24% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | TechStar CVT (continuously-variable transmission) | Stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 206in | — |
| Width | 72in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,810lb | 14,562lb | ▲ MT475E+2,248 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Driven directly by engine | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29.6gpm | 29.1gpm | ▲ MT475E+0.5 gpm · +2% |
| Pressure | 2,721psi | 2,901psi | ▲ 716+180 psi · +7% |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 132hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/70R28;* | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 580/70R38;* | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
| Alternator Amperage | Not recorded | 200 | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction, Diesel oxidation catalyst | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT475E | Fendt 716 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | Not recorded | 89.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 91st percentile (132 hp)B · 93rd percentile (162 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 88th percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,810 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,562 lb)
A · MT475EB · 716Median Utility Tractor