ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT495D vs Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500
Mercedes-BenzModel B
Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 346 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 14
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
Mercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz Trac 1500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT495D150 hp
Trac 1500150 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; Trac 1500 is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Trac 1500 higher · +47 ci (+16%)MT495D299 ci
Trac 1500346 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT495D is in the 84th percentile; Trac 1500 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Trac 1500 higher · +2 (+50%)MT495D4
Trac 15006
Median Utility Tractor4
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; Trac 1500 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT495D higher · +10 (+71%)MT495D24
Trac 150014
Median Utility Tractor12
MT495D is in the 92nd percentile; Trac 1500 is in the 63rd · 4,941 models
MT495D (A)Trac 1500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Mercedes-Benz | — |
| Model | MT495D | Trac 1500 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Mercedes-Benz | — |
| Model | 49AWI | OM 352A | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ Trac 1500+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Trac 1500+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 346ci | ▲ Trac 1500+47 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.8in | ▲ MT495D+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ MT495D+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 184in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 115in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 13,715lb | ▲ MT495D+2,050 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R34 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | 4x4 WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Mercedes-Benz Trac 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 93rd percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 86th percentile (346 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 63rd percentile (14)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,715 lb)
A · MT495DB · Trac 1500Median Utility Tractor