ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT495D vs Steyr 6150 CVT
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 6150 CVT
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
SteyrSteyr 6150 CVT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT495D150 hp
6150 CVT150 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 6150 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6150 CVT higher · +104 ci (+35%)MT495D299 ci
6150 CVT403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT495D is in the 84th percentile; 6150 CVT is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 6150 CVT higher · +2 (+50%)MT495D4
6150 CVT6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; 6150 CVT is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT495D higher · +1,677 lb (+12%)MT495D15,765 lb
6150 CVT14,088 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 6150 CVT is in the 92nd · 5,107 models
MT495D (A)6150 CVT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steyr | — |
| Model | MT495D | 6150 CVT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Sisu | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT495D+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 6150 CVT+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 403ci | ▲ 6150 CVT+104 ci · +35% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ MT495D+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 188in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 14,088lb | ▲ MT495D+1,677 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category III/II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Steyr 6150 CVT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 93rd percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 92nd percentile (14,088 lb)
A · MT495DB · 6150 CVTMedian Utility Tractor