ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495E
Agricultural
- power
- 138 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT495E vs County 1454
CountyModel B
County 1454
Agricultural
- power
- 138 hp
- displacement
- 401 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT495E
vs
CountyCounty 1454
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT495E138 hp
1454138 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT495E is in the 65th percentile; 1454 is in the 65th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1454 higher · +102 ci (+34%)MT495E299 ci
1454401 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT495E is in the 46th percentile; 1454 is in the 65th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 1454 higher · +2 (+50%)MT495E4
14546
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT495E is in the 31st percentile; 1454 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT495E higher · +16 (+200%)MT495E24
14548
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT495E is in the 81st percentile; 1454 is in the 16th · 972 models
MT495E (A)1454 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | County | — |
| Model | MT495E | 1454 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Ford | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 401DFT | — |
| Power Output | 138hp | 138hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1454+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 1454+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 401ci | ▲ 1454+102 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 1454+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.4in | ▲ MT495E+0.9 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | TechStar CVT | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 72in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,810lb | 15,038lb | ▲ MT495E+1,772 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 60.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 66.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | 60.2 to 89.8 inches | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | 66.3 to 96.7 inches | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc, operated by two foot pedals that can be locked together | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electronic | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT495E | County 1454 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR exhaust treatment | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 65th percentile (138 hp)B · 65th percentile (138 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 46th percentile (299 ci)B · 65th percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 76th percentile (16,810 lb)B · 70th percentile (15,038 lb)
A · MT495EB · 1454Median Agricultural Tractor