Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT525B
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT525B vs IMT 5100
Image not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT525B
vs
IMTIMT 5100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 5100 higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT525B104 hp
5100105 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT525B is in the 47th percentile; 5100 is in the 48th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B higher · +48 ci (+14%)MT525B402 ci
5100354 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT525B is in the 66th percentile; 5100 is in the 52nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT525B6
51006
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT525B is in the 74th percentile; 5100 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B higher · +1,970 lb (+15%)MT525B15,200 lb
510013,230 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT525B is in the 70th percentile; 5100 is in the 61st · 971 models
MT525B (A)5100 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | IMT | — |
| Model | MT525B | 5100 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | IMT | — |
| Model | U092650K | IMR S 46/T | — |
| Power Output | 104hp | 105hp | ▲ 5100+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 5100+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 354ci | ▲ MT525B+48 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ MT525B+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 169in | 190in | ▲ 5100+21 in · +12% |
| Width | 81.1in | 86.7in | ▲ 5100+5.6 in · +7% |
| Height | 113in | 113in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 15,200lb | 13,230lb | ▲ MT525B+1,970 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/III | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2/3 | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Two-Wheel Drive | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 47th percentile (104 hp)B · 48th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 52nd percentile (354 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 70th percentile (15,200 lb)B · 61st percentile (13,230 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 47th percentile (169 in)B · 71st percentile (190 in)
A · MT525BB · 5100Median Agricultural Tractor