Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT525B
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT525B vs Iseki T10520
Image not recorded
IsekiModel B
Iseki T10520
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 353 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT525B
vs
IsekiIseki T10520
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT525B104 hp
T10520104 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT525B is in the 47th percentile; T10520 is in the 47th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B higher · +49 ci (+14%)MT525B402 ci
T10520353 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT525B is in the 66th percentile; T10520 is in the 51st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT525B6
T105206
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT525B is in the 74th percentile; T10520 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B higher · +6,734 lb (+80%)MT525B15,200 lb
T105208,466 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT525B is in the 70th percentile; T10520 is in the 35th · 971 models
MT525B (A)T10520 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Iseki | — |
| Model | MT525B | T10520 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins Diesel | Isuzu | — |
| Model | U092650K | 6BD1 | — |
| Power Output | 104hp | 104hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 353ci | ▲ MT525B+49 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ MT525B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ MT525B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Syncromesh, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 169in | 166in | ▲ MT525B+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 81.1in | 80.7in | ▲ MT525B+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 113in | 105in | ▲ MT525B+8 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 15,200lb | 8,466lb | ▲ MT525B+6,734 lb · +80% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/III | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2/3 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Two-Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT525B | Iseki T10520 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 47th percentile (104 hp)B · 47th percentile (104 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 51st percentile (353 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 70th percentile (15,200 lb)B · 35th percentile (8,466 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 47th percentile (169 in)B · 45th percentile (166 in)
A · MT525BB · T10520Median Agricultural Tractor