Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT525D
Utility
- power
- 136 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT525D vs Steyr 6135 Profi
SteyrModel B
Steyr 6135 Profi
Utility
- power
- 136 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT525D
vs
SteyrSteyr 6135 Profi
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT525D136 hp
6135 Profi136 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT525D is in the 92nd percentile; 6135 Profi is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6135 Profi higher · +9 ci (+2%)MT525D402 ci
6135 Profi411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT525D is in the 90th percentile; 6135 Profi is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT525D6
6135 Profi6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT525D is in the 93rd percentile; 6135 Profi is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6135 Profi higher · +8 (+50%)MT525D16
6135 Profi24
Median Utility Tractor12
MT525D is in the 73rd percentile; 6135 Profi is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
MT525D (A)6135 Profi (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steyr | — |
| Model | MT525D | 6135 Profi | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu AGCO Power | Iveco | — |
| Power Output | 136hp | 136hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 411ci | ▲ 6135 Profi+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ MT525D+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ 6135 Profi+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (4) range operator-controlled powershift | PowerShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 178in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 75.3in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 115in | — |
| Wheelbase | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,920lb | 11,790lb | ▲ MT525D+2,130 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 25.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,170psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 420/85R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 520/85R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT525D | Steyr 6135 Profi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 92nd percentile (136 hp)B · 92nd percentile (136 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 92nd percentile (13,920 lb)B · 90th percentile (11,790 lb)
A · MT525DB · 6135 ProfiMedian Utility Tractor