Head to head · Row Crop

Challenger MT535 vs Challenger MT545

Challenger MT535 Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT535

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
365 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
32
Full MT535 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT545

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
365 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
32
Full MT545 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT545

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 8061,417

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT535365 ci
MT545365 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

MT535 is in the 43rd percentile; MT545 is in the 43rd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT5356
MT5456
Median Row Crop Tractor6

MT535 is in the 50th percentile; MT545 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT53532
MT54532
Median Row Crop Tractor16

MT535 is in the 91st percentile; MT545 is in the 91st · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT545 higher · +482 lb (+5%)
MT5359,600 lb
MT54510,082 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

MT535 is in the 29th percentile; MT545 is in the 32nd · 1,350 models

MT535 (A)MT545 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT535MT545
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
Model30563056Same
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement365ci365ciSame
Bore3.9in3.9inSame
Stroke5in5inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
TypePartial Power ShiftPartial power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
Length179in179inSame
Width88in88inSame
Height109in109inSame
Operating Weight9,600lb10,082lbMT545+482 lb · +5%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Same
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
Hitch TypeIIThree-Point Hitch
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT535Challenger MT545Difference
TypeOptional CabCab

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 43rd percentile (365 ci)B · 43rd percentile (365 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 91st percentile (32)B · 91st percentile (32)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 32nd percentile (10,082 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 50th percentile (179 in)B · 50th percentile (179 in)
A · MT535B · MT545Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT535Full spec pageChallenger MT545