Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT535D
Utility
- power
- 144 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT535D vs John Deere 6R 145
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 6R 145
Utility
- power
- 145 hp
- displacement
- 415 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT535D
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 6R 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6R 145 higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT535D144 hp
6R 145145 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT535D is in the 92nd percentile; 6R 145 is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6R 145 higher · +12 ci (+3%)MT535D403 ci
6R 145415 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT535D is in the 90th percentile; 6R 145 is in the 92nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT535D6
6R 1456
Median Utility Tractor4
MT535D is in the 93rd percentile; 6R 145 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535D higher · +1,543 lb (+10%)MT535D16,755 lb
6R 14515,212 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT535D is in the 94th percentile; 6R 145 is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
MT535D (A)6R 145 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT535D | 6R 145 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech PVS | — |
| Power Output | 144hp | 145hp | ▲ 6R 145+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 415ci | ▲ 6R 145+12 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.2in | ▲ MT535D+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ 6R 145+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 16,755lb | 15,212lb | ▲ MT535D+1,543 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Closed-center PFC | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 60.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 61.7in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter, 12 volt | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT535D | John Deere 6R 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 92nd percentile (144 hp)B · 92nd percentile (145 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 92nd percentile (415 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,212 lb)
A · MT535DB · 6R 145Median Utility Tractor