ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT545D
Utility
- power
- 152 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT545D vs Massey Ferguson 7S.155
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 7S.155
Utility
- power
- 153 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT545D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7S.155
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7S.155 higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT545D152 hp
7S.155153 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT545D is in the 93rd percentile; 7S.155 is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7S.155 higher · +1 ci (<1%)MT545D402 ci
7S.155403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT545D is in the 90th percentile; 7S.155 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT545D6
7S.1556
Median Utility Tractor4
MT545D is in the 93rd percentile; 7S.155 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT545D higher · +1,983 lb (+16%)MT545D14,770 lb
7S.15512,787 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT545D is in the 93rd percentile; 7S.155 is in the 91st · 5,107 models
MT545D (A)7S.155 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT545D | 7S.155 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu AGCO Power | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 66LFNT-D5 | — |
| Power Output | 152hp | 153hp | ▲ 7S.155+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 403ci | ▲ 7S.155+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | CVT and Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 194in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Wheelbase | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,770lb | 12,787lb | ▲ MT545D+1,983 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 520/65R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 650/65R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier IV | Stage V | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT545D | Massey Ferguson 7S.155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (152 hp)B · 93rd percentile (153 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (14,770 lb)B · 91st percentile (12,787 lb)
A · MT545DB · 7S.155Median Utility Tractor