Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT545E
Utility
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT545E vs Challenger MT585B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT585B
Utility
- power
- 181 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT545E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT585B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT585B higher · +16 hp (+10%)MT545E165 hp
MT585B181 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT545E is in the 94th percentile; MT585B is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT585B higher · +47 ci (+12%)MT545E402 ci
MT585B449 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT545E is in the 90th percentile; MT585B is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT545E6
MT585B6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT545E is in the 93rd percentile; MT585B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
MT545E (A)MT585B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT545E | MT585B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO S.A. | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Power 74CTA | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | 181hp | ▲ MT585B+16 hp · +10% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT585B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 449ci | ▲ MT585B+47 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT585B+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 200in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 17,860lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.2gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,875psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 420/90R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/80R46 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Quick Attach | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Challenger MT585B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (165 hp)B · 94th percentile (181 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 93rd percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
A · MT545EB · MT585BMedian Utility Tractor