Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT545E
Utility
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT545E vs Fendt 3125
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 3125
Utility
- power
- 123 hp
- displacement
- 247 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT545E
vs
FendtFendt 3125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT545E higher · +42 hp (+34%)MT545E165 hp
3125123 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT545E is in the 94th percentile; 3125 is in the 90th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT545E higher · +155 ci (+63%)MT545E402 ci
3125247 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT545E is in the 90th percentile; 3125 is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT545E higher · +2 (+50%)MT545E6
31254
Median Utility Tractor4
MT545E is in the 93rd percentile; 3125 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
MT545E (A)3125 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT545E | 3125 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO S.A. | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | 123hp | ▲ MT545E+42 hp · +34% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT545E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 402ci | 247ci | ▲ MT545E+155 ci · +63% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 164in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 94.8in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 93.6in | — |
| Ground Clearance | Not recorded | 18.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 9,590lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.2gpm | 20.7gpm | ▲ MT545E+9.5 gpm · +46% |
| Pressure | 2,875psi | 2,901psi | ▲ 3125+26 psi · <1% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT545E | Fendt 3125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | Not recorded | 55.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (165 hp)B · 90th percentile (123 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 69th percentile (247 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · MT545EB · 3125Median Utility Tractor