ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT555B MFWD
Row Crop
- power
- 130 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger MT555B MFWD vs Challenger MT665
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT555B MFWD
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MT665 higher · +110 ci (+27%)MT555B MFWD403 ci
MT665513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MT555B MFWD is in the 56th percentile; MT665 is in the 92nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT555B MFWD6
MT6656
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MT555B MFWD is in the 50th percentile; MT665 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665 higher · +6,500 lb (+43%)MT555B MFWD15,000 lb
MT66521,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MT555B MFWD is in the 66th percentile; MT665 is in the 87th · 1,350 models
Length
▲ MT665 higher · +12 in (+6%)MT555B MFWD191 in
MT665203 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in
MT555B MFWD is in the 63rd percentile; MT665 is in the 78th · 1,157 models
MT555B MFWD (A)MT665 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT555B MFWD | MT665 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Sisu | — |
| Model | C6.6 ACERT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 130hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 513ci | ▲ MT665+110 ci · +27% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Auto Power | 18-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 191in | 203in | ▲ MT665+12 in · +6% |
| Width | 81.6in | 98.2in | ▲ MT665+16.6 in · +20% |
| Height | 124in | 121in | ▲ MT555B MFWD+3 in · +2% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,000lb | 21,500lb | ▲ MT665+6,500 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 14,283lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT555B MFWD | Challenger MT665 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 56th percentile (403 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 66th percentile (15,000 lb)B · 87th percentile (21,500 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 63rd percentile (191 in)B · 78th percentile (203 in)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 29th percentile (81.6 in)B · 79th percentile (98.2 in)
A · MT555B MFWDB · MT665Median Row Crop Tractor