Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT555E vs Ford 8670

Challenger MT555E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT555E

Agricultural

power
170 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT555E specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford 8670

Agricultural

power
170 hp
displacement
456 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8670 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT555E
vs
FordFord 8670

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 93–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT555E170 hp
8670170 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 8670 is in the 74th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8670 higher · +54 ci (+13%)
MT555E402 ci
8670456 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT555E is in the 66th percentile; 8670 is in the 82nd · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT555E6
86706
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT555E is in the 74th percentile; 8670 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT555E higher · +156 lb (<1%)
MT555E18,355 lb
867018,199 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT555E is in the 79th percentile; 8670 is in the 79th · 971 models

MT555E (A)8670 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
ManufacturerChallengerFord—
ModelMT555E8670—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerFord—
Power Output170hp170hpSame
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement402ci456ci▲ 8670+54 ci · +13%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke4.7in5in▲ 8670+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
TypeContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Full Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
LengthNot recorded197in—
WidthNot recorded96.7in—
HeightNot recorded121in—
Operating Weight18,355lb18,199lb▲ MT555E+156 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
System TypeDirect engine driveClosed Center Load Sensing—
Pump Flow Capacity32.9gpmNot recorded—
Pressure2,110psiNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostaticNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
Front Tire Size480/70R30Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size620/70R4218.4R42—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity15,105lb10,000lb▲ MT555E+5,105 lb · +51%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
Chassis TypeFront-wheel assistNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostaticNot recorded—
Brake TypeMultiple wet disc hydraulically operatedNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
CoolantNot recorded6.6gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT555EFord 8670Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 74th percentile (170 hp)B · 74th percentile (170 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 82nd percentile (456 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 79th percentile (18,355 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,199 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 12,126 lb
A · 64th percentile (15,105 lb)B · 39th percentile (10,000 lb)
A · MT555EB · 8670Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT555EFull spec pageFord 8670