Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT565B
Agricultural
- power
- 186 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT565B vs Fendt 722
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 722
Agricultural
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT565B
vs
FendtFendt 722
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT565B higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT565B186 hp
722185 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT565B is in the 78th percentile; 722 is in the 78th · 1,028 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT565B6
7226
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT565B is in the 74th percentile; 722 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT565B higher · +1,236 lb (+8%)MT565B16,635 lb
72215,399 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT565B is in the 75th percentile; 722 is in the 71st · 971 models
Length
▲ 722 higher · +24 in (+13%)MT565B182 in
722206 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
MT565B is in the 61st percentile; 722 is in the 82nd · 829 models
MT565B (A)722 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT565B | 722 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | VK 31483 | 722 | — |
| Power Output | 186hp | 185hp | ▲ MT565B+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT565B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range-operator controlled power shift | ML 180 HD | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 182in | 206in | ▲ 722+24 in · +13% |
| Width | 81.1in | 101in | ▲ 722+19.9 in · +25% |
| Height | 113in | 121in | ▲ 722+8 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 16,635lb | 15,399lb | ▲ MT565B+1,236 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,230lb | 7,011lb | ▲ MT565B+4,219 lb · +60% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT565B | Fendt 722 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 78th percentile (186 hp)B · 78th percentile (185 hp)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 75th percentile (16,635 lb)B · 71st percentile (15,399 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 61st percentile (182 in)B · 82nd percentile (206 in)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 53rd percentile (81.1 in)B · 86th percentile (101 in)
A · MT565BB · 722Median Agricultural Tractor