ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT565E
Utility
- power
- 198 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT565E vs Challenger MT645C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645C
Utility
- power
- 242 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT565E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT645C higher · +44 hp (+22%)MT565E198 hp
MT645C242 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT565E is in the 95th percentile; MT645C is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT645C higher · +111 ci (+28%)MT565E402 ci
MT645C513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT565E is in the 90th percentile; MT645C is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT565E6
MT645C6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT565E is in the 93rd percentile; MT645C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645C higher · +14,615 lb (+131%)MT565E11,180 lb
MT645C25,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT565E is in the 89th percentile; MT645C is in the 96th · 5,107 models
MT565E (A)MT645C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT565E | MT645C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | AGCO | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Sisu Diesel (Serial No. T00767) | — |
| Power Output | 198hp | 242hp | ▲ MT645C+44 hp · +22% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 513ci | ▲ MT645C+111 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ MT645C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.7in | ▲ MT645C+1 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 223in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 133in | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,180lb | 25,795lb | ▲ MT645C+14,615 lb · +131% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing with detailed performance specifications | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29gpm | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 15,106lb | 26,460lb | ▲ MT645C+11,354 lb · +75% |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (198 hp)B · 96th percentile (242 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 89th percentile (11,180 lb)B · 96th percentile (25,795 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 95th percentile (15,106 lb)B · 99th percentile (26,460 lb)
A · MT565EB · MT645CMedian Utility Tractor