Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT565E vs Challenger MT755E

Challenger MT565E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT565E

Utility

power
198 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT565E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT755E

Utility

power
326 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
16
Full MT755E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT565E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT755E higher · +128 hp (+65%)
MT565E198 hp
MT755E326 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT565E is in the 95th percentile; MT755E is in the 97th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755E higher · +197 ci (+49%)
MT565E402 ci
MT755E599 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT565E is in the 90th percentile; MT755E is in the 95th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT755E higher · +1 (+17%)
MT565E6
MT755E7
Median Utility Tractor4

MT565E is in the 93rd percentile; MT755E is in the 98th · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT755E higher · +22,055 lb (+197%)
MT565E11,180 lb
MT755E33,235 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT565E is in the 89th percentile; MT755E is in the 98th · 5,107 models

MT565E (A)MT755E (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT565EMT755E—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO POWERSame
Power Output198hp326hp▲ MT755E+128 hp · +65%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,800RPM▲ MT565E+300 RPM · +17%
Cylinders67▲ MT755E+1 · +17%
Displacement402ci599ci▲ MT755E+197 ci · +49%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ MT755E+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke4.7in5.7in▲ MT755E+1 in · +21%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
TypeContinuously-variable transmission (CVT)Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
WidthNot recorded34in—
Operating Weight11,180lb33,235lb▲ MT755E+22,055 lb · +197%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
System TypeClosed-center load sensing with detailed performance specificationsClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)—
Pump Flow Capacity29gpmNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedElectro-hydraulic differential—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—
Speed 2540rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
Hitch TypeIII/IIINCategory IVN/III—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Category 3Same
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity15,106lb17,263lb▲ MT755E+2,157 lb · +14%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
Steering TypeNot recordedElectro-hydraulic differential—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT565EChallenger MT755EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 95th percentile (198 hp)B · 97th percentile (326 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 95th percentile (599 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 89th percentile (11,180 lb)B · 98th percentile (33,235 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 95th percentile (15,106 lb)B · 97th percentile (17,263 lb)
A · MT565EB · MT755EMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT565EFull spec pageChallenger MT755E