ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT565E
Utility
- power
- 198 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT565E vs New Holland TM175
New HollandModel B
New Holland TM175
Utility
- power
- 196 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT565E
vs
New HollandNew Holland TM175
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT565E higher · +2 hp (+1%)MT565E198 hp
TM175196 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT565E is in the 95th percentile; TM175 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TM175 higher · +54 ci (+13%)MT565E402 ci
TM175456 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT565E is in the 90th percentile; TM175 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT565E6
TM1756
Median Utility Tractor4
MT565E is in the 93rd percentile; TM175 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ TM175 higher · +4,615 lb (+41%)MT565E11,180 lb
TM17515,795 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT565E is in the 89th percentile; TM175 is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
MT565E (A)TM175 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT565E | TM175 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | New Holland | — |
| Power Output | 198hp | 196hp | ▲ MT565E+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TM175+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 456ci | ▲ TM175+54 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ TM175+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ TM175+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 189in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 114in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 111in | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,180lb | 15,795lb | ▲ TM175+4,615 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing with detailed performance specifications | Open Center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29gpm | 31.2gpm | ▲ TM175+2.2 gpm · +8% |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,755psi | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | 1,000rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | 1,021rpm | ▲ TM175+481 rpm · +89% |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 540/65R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 650/65R42 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 60.2in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 61.4 to 89.0 in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 60.2 to 87.8 in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Cat II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 15,106lb | 18,455lb | ▲ TM175+3,349 lb · +22% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Front wheel assist | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc hydraulically operated | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT565E | New Holland TM175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (198 hp)B · 94th percentile (196 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 93rd percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 89th percentile (11,180 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,795 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 95th percentile (15,106 lb)B · 97th percentile (18,455 lb)
A · MT565EB · TM175Median Utility Tractor