Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT575D
Agricultural
- power
- 202 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT575D vs Fendt 722 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 722 Vario
Agricultural
- power
- 205 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT575D
vs
FendtFendt 722 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 722 Vario higher · +3 hp (+1%)MT575D202 hp
722 Vario205 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT575D is in the 81st percentile; 722 Vario is in the 82nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT575D higher · +32 ci (+9%)MT575D402 ci
722 Vario370 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT575D is in the 66th percentile; 722 Vario is in the 60th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT575D6
722 Vario6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT575D is in the 74th percentile; 722 Vario is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT575D higher · +1,067 lb (+6%)MT575D18,660 lb
722 Vario17,593 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT575D is in the 80th percentile; 722 Vario is in the 78th · 971 models
MT575D (A)722 Vario (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT575D | 722 Vario | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | Deutz | — |
| Model | Power 6.6L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 202hp | 205hp | ▲ 722 Vario+3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 370ci | ▲ MT575D+32 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4in | ▲ MT575D+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ 722 Vario+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT (Combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 200in | 206in | ▲ 722 Vario+6 in · +3% |
| Width | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Height | 121in | 120in | ▲ MT575D+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 18,660lb | 17,593lb | ▲ MT575D+1,067 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT575D | Fendt 722 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 81st percentile (202 hp)B · 82nd percentile (205 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 60th percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 80th percentile (18,660 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,593 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 78th percentile (200 in)B · 83rd percentile (206 in)
A · MT575DB · 722 VarioMedian Agricultural Tractor