Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT575D vs Massey Ferguson 8S.205

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT575D

Agricultural

power
202 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT575D specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8S.205

Agricultural

power
203 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
28
Full 8S.205 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT575D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8S.205

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ 8S.205 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT575D202 hp
8S.205203 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT575D is in the 81st percentile; 8S.205 is in the 81st · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8S.205 higher · +47 ci (+12%)
MT575D402 ci
8S.205449 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT575D is in the 66th percentile; 8S.205 is in the 80th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT575D6
8S.2056
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT575D is in the 74th percentile; 8S.205 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8S.205 higher · +3,386 lb (+18%)
MT575D18,660 lb
8S.20522,046 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT575D is in the 80th percentile; 8S.205 is in the 88th · 971 models

MT575D (A)8S.205 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT575D8S.205—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
ManufacturerSisu DieselAGCO Power—
ModelPower 6.6LNot recorded—
Power Output202hp203hp▲ 8S.205+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,850RPM▲ MT575D+250 RPM · +14%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement402ci449ci▲ 8S.205+47 ci · +12%
Bore4.3in4.3inSame
Stroke4.7in5.3in▲ 8S.205+0.6 in · +13%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
TypeCVT (Combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections)Continuously Variable—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
Length200in212in▲ 8S.205+12 in · +6%
Height121in134in▲ 8S.205+13 in · +11%
Operating Weight18,660lb22,046lb▲ 8S.205+3,386 lb · +18%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed Center Load-Sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
TypeNot recorded540/1000—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIICategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT575DMassey Ferguson 8S.205Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 81st percentile (202 hp)B · 81st percentile (203 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 66th percentile (402 ci)B · 80th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 80th percentile (18,660 lb)B · 88th percentile (22,046 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 78th percentile (200 in)B · 86th percentile (212 in)
A · MT575DB · 8S.205Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT575DFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 8S.205