ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT575E
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT575E vs Renault Atles 925
Image not recorded
RenaultModel B
Renault Atles 925
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT575E
vs
RenaultRenault Atles 925
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT575E240 hp
Atles 925240 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT575E is in the 87th percentile; Atles 925 is in the 87th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT575E higher · +13 ci (+3%)MT575E449 ci
Atles 925436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT575E is in the 79th percentile; Atles 925 is in the 78th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT575E6
Atles 9256
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT575E is in the 74th percentile; Atles 925 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
MT575E (A)Atles 925 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Renault | — |
| Model | MT575E | Atles 925 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | BF6L1013FC | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 240hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ MT575E+300 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 436ci | ▲ MT575E+13 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.1in | ▲ MT575E+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 226in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 126in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 21,300lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT575E | Renault Atles 925 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 87th percentile (240 hp)B · 87th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 79th percentile (449 ci)B · 78th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
A · MT575EB · Atles 925Median Agricultural Tractor