Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT595B
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT595B vs John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 415 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT595B
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7820 155 PTO hp
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ MT595B higher · +34 ci (+8%)MT595B449 ci
7820 155 PTO hp415 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT595B is in the 80th percentile; 7820 155 PTO hp is in the 72nd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT595B6
7820 155 PTO hp6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT595B is in the 74th percentile; 7820 155 PTO hp is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT595B higher · +1,686 lb (+11%)MT595B17,685 lb
7820 155 PTO hp15,999 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT595B is in the 78th percentile; 7820 155 PTO hp is in the 74th · 971 models
MT595B (A)7820 155 PTO hp (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT595B | 7820 155 PTO hp | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | 2240 | — |
| Model | 74CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 415ci | ▲ MT595B+34 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 200in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,685lb | 15,999lb | ▲ MT595B+1,686 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 155hp | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.00-16 8PR (F2) | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/80R42 151A8 (R1) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT595B | John Deere 7820 155 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 80th percentile (449 ci)B · 72nd percentile (415 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 78th percentile (17,685 lb)B · 74th percentile (15,999 lb)
A · MT595BB · 7820 155 PTO hpMedian Agricultural Tractor