Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT595D
Agricultural
- power
- 234 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT595D vs Challenger MT655C SCR
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT655C SCR
Agricultural
- power
- 234 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT595D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT655C SCR
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT595D234 hp
MT655C SCR234 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT595D is in the 86th percentile; MT655C SCR is in the 86th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT655C SCR higher · +64 ci (+14%)MT595D449 ci
MT655C SCR513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT595D is in the 79th percentile; MT655C SCR is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT595D6
MT655C SCR6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT595D is in the 74th percentile; MT655C SCR is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT655C SCR higher · +6,485 lb (+34%)MT595D19,310 lb
MT655C SCR25,795 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT595D is in the 81st percentile; MT655C SCR is in the 93rd · 971 models
MT595D (A)MT655C SCR (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT595D | MT655C SCR | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu AGCO Power | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 234hp | 234hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT655C SCR+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 449ci | 513ci | ▲ MT655C SCR+64 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ MT655C SCR+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.7in | ▲ MT655C SCR+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 223in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 133in | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,310lb | 25,795lb | ▲ MT655C SCR+6,485 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Closed Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 540/65R30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 650/65R42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT595D | Challenger MT655C SCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volt | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 86th percentile (234 hp)B · 86th percentile (234 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 79th percentile (449 ci)B · 88th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 81st percentile (19,310 lb)B · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)
A · MT595DB · MT655C SCRMedian Agricultural Tractor