Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT595E vs Challenger MT755E

Challenger MT595E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT595E

Utility

power
236 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT595E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT755E

Utility

power
326 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
16
Full MT755E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT595E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT755E higher · +90 hp (+38%)
MT595E236 hp
MT755E326 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT595E is in the 95th percentile; MT755E is in the 97th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755E higher · +150 ci (+33%)
MT595E449 ci
MT755E599 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT595E is in the 93rd percentile; MT755E is in the 95th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT755E higher · +1 (+17%)
MT595E6
MT755E7
Median Utility Tractor4

MT595E is in the 93rd percentile; MT755E is in the 98th · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT755E higher · +14,770 lb (+80%)
MT595E18,465 lb
MT755E33,235 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT595E is in the 94th percentile; MT755E is in the 98th · 5,107 models

MT595E (A)MT755E (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT595EMT755E—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO POWERSame
Power Output236hp326hp▲ MT755E+90 hp · +38%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,800RPM▲ MT595E+300 RPM · +17%
Cylinders67▲ MT755E+1 · +17%
Displacement449ci599ci▲ MT755E+150 ci · +33%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ MT755E+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.3in5.7in▲ MT755E+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
TypeContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT) with power management systemSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
WidthNot recorded34in—
Wheelbase117inNot recorded—
Operating Weight18,465lb33,235lb▲ MT755E+14,770 lb · +80%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
System TypeClosed-center load sensingClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)—
Pump Flow Capacity29.9gpmNot recorded—
Pressure2,490psiNot recorded—
Steering TypePower SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
Front Tire Size480/70R30Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size620/70R42Not recorded—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
Front Tread Width52.8inNot recorded—
Rear Tread52.8inNot recorded—
Front Tread Adjustment52.8 to 87.8 inNot recorded—
Rear Tread Adjustment52.8 to 87.8 inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchCategory IVN/III—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity15,105lb17,263lb▲ MT755E+2,158 lb · +14%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
Chassis Type4x4Not recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePower SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT595EChallenger MT755EDifference
TypeCabinNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 95th percentile (236 hp)B · 97th percentile (326 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 93rd percentile (449 ci)B · 95th percentile (599 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (18,465 lb)B · 98th percentile (33,235 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 95th percentile (15,105 lb)B · 97th percentile (17,263 lb)
A · MT595EB · MT755EMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT595EFull spec pageChallenger MT755E