Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT645D vs Claas Xerion 2500

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT645D

Four-Wheel Drive

power
251 hp
displacement
514 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT645D specs
Claas Xerion 2500 Tractor
ClaasModel B

Claas Xerion 2500

Four-Wheel Drive

power
250 hp
displacement
530 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Xerion 2500 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT645D
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 2500

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 98–162

Engine Power

▲ MT645D higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT645D251 hp
Xerion 2500250 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT645D is in the 15th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 15th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Xerion 2500 higher · +16 ci (+3%)
MT645D514 ci
Xerion 2500530 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT645D is in the 10th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 11th · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT645D6
Xerion 25006
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT645D is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 50th · 159 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT645D higher · +4,417 lb (+21%)
MT645D25,365 lb
Xerion 250020,948 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb

MT645D is in the 22nd percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 13th · 132 models

MT645D (A)Xerion 2500 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
ManufacturerChallengerClaas—
ModelMT645DXerion 2500—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
ManufacturerSisu DieselPerkins—
ModelNot recorded1306—
Power Output251hp250hp▲ MT645D+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM1,950RPM2,100RPM▲ Xerion 2500+150 RPM · +8%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement514ci530ci▲ Xerion 2500+16 ci · +3%
Bore4.4in4.6in▲ Xerion 2500+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.7in5.3in▲ MT645D+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
TypeCVT (combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections)Hydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Length216in248in▲ Xerion 2500+32 in · +15%
Height141in138in▲ MT645D+3 in · +2%
Operating Weight25,365lb20,948lb▲ MT645D+4,417 lb · +21%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Not recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic PowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Front Tire Size600/65R34Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size710/75R42Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Hitch TypeIIINot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Chassis Type4x44x4 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic PowerSame
Brake TypeMultiple wet disc hydraulically operated by two foot pedals that can be locked togetherNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT645DClaas Xerion 2500Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 15th percentile (251 hp)B · 15th percentile (250 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 10th percentile (514 ci)B · 11th percentile (530 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 22nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 13th percentile (20,948 lb)

Length

median 275 in
A · 5th percentile (216 in)B · 20th percentile (248 in)
A · MT645DB · Xerion 2500Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT645DFull spec pageClaas Xerion 2500