Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT645E
Agricultural
- power
- 243 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT645E vs Versatile 260
VersatileModel B
Versatile 260
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 543 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT645E
vs
VersatileVersatile 260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 260 higher · +17 hp (+7%)MT645E243 hp
260260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT645E is in the 87th percentile; 260 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 260 higher · +30 ci (+6%)MT645E513 ci
260543 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT645E is in the 88th percentile; 260 is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT645E6
2606
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT645E is in the 74th percentile; 260 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645E higher · +725 lb (+3%)MT645E24,670 lb
26023,945 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT645E is in the 91st percentile; 260 is in the 91st · 971 models
MT645E (A)260 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | MT645E | 260 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | QSL9 | — |
| Power Output | 243hp | 260hp | ▲ 260+17 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 543ci | ▲ 260+30 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 260+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Techstar CVT (Continuously Variable transmission) | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | 252in | ▲ 260+33 in · +15% |
| Height | 141in | 132in | ▲ MT645E+9 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 23,945lb | ▲ MT645E+725 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III / IVN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT645E | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 87th percentile (243 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 90th percentile (543 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 91st percentile (23,945 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 89th percentile (219 in)B · 96th percentile (252 in)
A · MT645EB · 260Median Agricultural Tractor