Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Fendt 828
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 828
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
FendtFendt 828
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT655B260 hp
828260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; 828 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT655B higher · +143 ci (+39%)MT655B513 ci
828370 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; 828 is in the 61st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
8286
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; 828 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 828 higher · +1,284 lb (+7%)MT655B19,550 lb
82820,834 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; 828 is in the 86th · 971 models
MT655B (A)828 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT655B | 828 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 84ETA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 260hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT655B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 370ci | ▲ MT655B+143 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4in | ▲ MT655B+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5in | ▲ MT655B+0.7 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Continuously variable Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 208in | ▲ 828+2 in · <1% |
| Width | 118in | 101in | ▲ MT655B+17 in · +17% |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 20,834lb | ▲ 828+1,284 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 11,307lb | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 61st percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 86th percentile (20,834 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 84th percentile (208 in)
A · MT655BB · 828Median Agricultural Tractor