Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Hurlimann H-265
Image not recorded
HurlimannModel B
Hurlimann H-265
Agricultural
- power
- 263 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
HurlimannHurlimann H-265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ H-265 higher · +3 hp (+1%)MT655B260 hp
H-265263 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; H-265 is in the 90th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT655B higher · +8 ci (+2%)MT655B513 ci
H-265505 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; H-265 is in the 85th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
H-2656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; H-265 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ H-265 higher · +272 lb (+1%)MT655B19,550 lb
H-26519,822 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; H-265 is in the 83rd · 971 models
MT655B (A)H-265 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Hurlimann | — |
| Model | MT655B | H-265 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | SAME | — |
| Model | 84ETA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 263hp | ▲ H-265+3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT655B+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 505ci | ▲ MT655B+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ H-265+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT655B+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 193in | ▲ MT655B+13 in · +7% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 125in | ▲ H-265+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 19,822lb | ▲ H-265+272 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Hurlimann H-265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 90th percentile (263 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 85th percentile (505 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 83rd percentile (19,822 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 72nd percentile (193 in)
A · MT655BB · H-265Median Agricultural Tractor