Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Lamborghini Victory Plus 260
LamborghiniModel B
Lamborghini Victory Plus 260
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 40
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
LamborghiniLamborghini Victory Plus 260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT655B260 hp
Victory Plus 260260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; Victory Plus 260 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT655B higher · +77 ci (+18%)MT655B513 ci
Victory Plus 260436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; Victory Plus 260 is in the 76th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
Victory Plus 2606
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; Victory Plus 260 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT655B higher · +1,139 lb (+6%)MT655B19,550 lb
Victory Plus 26018,411 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; Victory Plus 260 is in the 79th · 971 models
MT655B (A)Victory Plus 260 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Lamborghini | — |
| Model | MT655B | Victory Plus 260 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 84ETA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 260hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ Victory Plus 260+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 436ci | ▲ MT655B+77 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ MT655B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.1in | ▲ MT655B+0.6 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 202in | ▲ MT655B+4 in · +2% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 127in | ▲ Victory Plus 260+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 18,411lb | ▲ MT655B+1,139 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Lamborghini Victory Plus 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 76th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,411 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 80th percentile (202 in)
A · MT655BB · Victory Plus 260Median Agricultural Tractor