Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT655B vs McCormick Intl ZTX260

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT655B

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT655B specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl ZTX260

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
507 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
36
Full ZTX260 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl ZTX260

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT655B260 hp
ZTX260260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT655B is in the 89th percentile; ZTX260 is in the 89th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT655B higher · +6 ci (+1%)
MT655B513 ci
ZTX260507 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT655B is in the 88th percentile; ZTX260 is in the 86th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT655B6
ZTX2606
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT655B is in the 74th percentile; ZTX260 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ ZTX260 higher · +2,941 lb (+15%)
MT655B19,550 lb
ZTX26022,491 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; ZTX260 is in the 89th · 971 models

MT655B (A)ZTX260 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMcCormick Intl—
ModelMT655BZTX260—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
ManufacturerSisuCummins—
Model84ETANot recorded—
Power Output260hp260hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci507ci▲ MT655B+6 ci · +1%
Bore4.4in4.5in▲ ZTX260+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.3in▲ MT655B+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Typecontinuously variable transmission (CVT)Not recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Length206in210in▲ ZTX260+4 in · +2%
Width118inNot recorded—
Height124in122in▲ MT655B+2 in · +2%
Operating Weight19,550lb22,491lb▲ ZTX260+2,941 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
System Typepressure flow compensated (PFC)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory III—
Hitch CategoryIIICategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT655BMcCormick Intl ZTX260Difference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 86th percentile (507 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,491 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 85th percentile (210 in)
A · MT655BB · ZTX260Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT655BFull spec pageMcCormick Intl ZTX260