Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Renault Atles 935
Image not recorded
RenaultModel B
Renault Atles 935
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
RenaultRenault Atles 935
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT655B260 hp
Atles 935260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; Atles 935 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT655B higher · +77 ci (+18%)MT655B513 ci
Atles 935436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; Atles 935 is in the 78th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
Atles 9356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; Atles 935 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Atles 935 higher · +3,117 lb (+16%)MT655B19,550 lb
Atles 93522,667 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; Atles 935 is in the 89th · 971 models
MT655B (A)Atles 935 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Renault | — |
| Model | MT655B | Atles 935 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Deutz | — |
| Model | 84ETA | BF6L1013FC | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 260hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ MT655B+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 436ci | ▲ MT655B+77 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ MT655B+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.1in | ▲ MT655B+0.6 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 226in | ▲ Atles 935+20 in · +10% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 128in | ▲ Atles 935+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 22,667lb | ▲ Atles 935+3,117 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Renault Atles 935 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 78th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,667 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 92nd percentile (226 in)
A · MT655BB · Atles 935Median Agricultural Tractor