Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT655B vs SAME Diamond 260

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT655B

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT655B specs
Image not recorded
SAMEModel B

SAME Diamond 260

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
436 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
40
Full Diamond 260 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
SAMESAME Diamond 260

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT655B260 hp
Diamond 260260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT655B is in the 89th percentile; Diamond 260 is in the 89th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT655B higher · +77 ci (+18%)
MT655B513 ci
Diamond 260436 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT655B is in the 88th percentile; Diamond 260 is in the 76th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT655B6
Diamond 2606
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT655B is in the 74th percentile; Diamond 260 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT655B higher · +918 lb (+5%)
MT655B19,550 lb
Diamond 26018,632 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; Diamond 260 is in the 80th · 971 models

MT655B (A)Diamond 260 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
ManufacturerChallengerSAME—
ModelMT655BDiamond 260—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
ManufacturerSisuSAME—
Model84ETANot recorded—
Power Output260hp260hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,350RPM▲ Diamond 260+150 RPM · +7%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci436ci▲ MT655B+77 ci · +18%
Bore4.4in4.3in▲ MT655B+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.1in▲ MT655B+0.6 in · +12%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Typecontinuously variable transmission (CVT)Not recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Length206in202in▲ MT655B+4 in · +2%
Width118inNot recorded—
Height124in127in▲ Diamond 260+3 in · +2%
Operating Weight19,550lb18,632lb▲ MT655B+918 lb · +5%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
System Typepressure flow compensated (PFC)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT655BSAME Diamond 260Difference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 76th percentile (436 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 80th percentile (18,632 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 79th percentile (202 in)
A · MT655BB · Diamond 260Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT655BFull spec pageSAME Diamond 260