Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT655B vs Valtra Q265

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT655B

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT655B specs
Image not recorded
ValtraModel B

Valtra Q265

Agricultural

power
262 hp
displacement
450 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Q265 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
ValtraValtra Q265

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ Q265 higher · +2 hp (<1%)
MT655B260 hp
Q265262 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT655B is in the 89th percentile; Q265 is in the 89th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT655B higher · +63 ci (+14%)
MT655B513 ci
Q265450 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT655B is in the 88th percentile; Q265 is in the 80th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT655B6
Q2656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT655B is in the 74th percentile; Q265 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ Q265 higher · +733 lb (+4%)
MT655B19,550 lb
Q26520,283 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; Q265 is in the 85th · 971 models

MT655B (A)Q265 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
ManufacturerChallengerValtra—
ModelMT655BQ265—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
ManufacturerSisuAGCO Power—
Model84ETA74 LFTN-D5—
Power Output260hp262hp▲ Q265+2 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,200RPM1,950RPM▲ MT655B+250 RPM · +13%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci450ci▲ MT655B+63 ci · +14%
Bore4.4in4.3in▲ MT655B+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.3in▲ MT655B+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
Typecontinuously variable transmission (CVT)continuously-variable transmission—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
Length206in219in▲ Q265+13 in · +6%
Width118in100in▲ MT655B+18 in · +18%
Height124in131in▲ Q265+7 in · +6%
Operating Weight19,550lb20,283lb▲ Q265+733 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
System Typepressure flow compensated (PFC)closed-center load sensing—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
Hitch CategoryIIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
Starter TypeElectricelectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT655BValtra Q265Difference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (262 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 80th percentile (450 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 85th percentile (20,283 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 89th percentile (219 in)
A · MT655BB · Q265Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT655BFull spec pageValtra Q265