Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT655B vs Versatile 265

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT655B

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT655B specs
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B

Versatile 265

Agricultural

power
260 hp
displacement
543 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 265 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
VersatileVersatile 265

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT655B260 hp
265260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT655B is in the 89th percentile; 265 is in the 89th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 265 higher · +30 ci (+6%)
MT655B513 ci
265543 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT655B is in the 88th percentile; 265 is in the 90th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT655B6
2656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT655B is in the 74th percentile; 265 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ 265 higher · +4,395 lb (+22%)
MT655B19,550 lb
26523,945 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; 265 is in the 91st · 971 models

MT655B (A)265 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
ManufacturerChallengerVersatile—
ModelMT655B265—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
ManufacturerSisuCummins—
Model84ETAQSL9—
Power Output260hp260hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM1,500RPM▲ MT655B+700 RPM · +47%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci543ci▲ 265+30 ci · +6%
Bore4.4in4.5in▲ 265+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.7inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
Typecontinuously variable transmission (CVT)Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
Length206in252in▲ 265+46 in · +22%
Width118inNot recorded—
Height124in132in▲ 265+8 in · +6%
Operating Weight19,550lb23,945lb▲ 265+4,395 lb · +22%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
System Typepressure flow compensated (PFC)Closed-Center Load Sensing—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
Hitch CategoryIIIIII/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT655BVersatile 265Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 90th percentile (543 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 91st percentile (23,945 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 96th percentile (252 in)
A · MT655BB · 265Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT655BFull spec pageVersatile 265