Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665B
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665B vs Challenger MT665C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT665B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT665B290 hp
MT665C290 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665B is in the 93rd percentile; MT665C is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT665B513 ci
MT665C513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665B is in the 88th percentile; MT665C is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665B6
MT665C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665B is in the 74th percentile; MT665C is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665C higher · +6,245 lb (+32%)MT665B19,550 lb
MT665C25,795 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665B is in the 82nd percentile; MT665C is in the 93rd · 971 models
MT665B (A)MT665C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT665B | MT665C | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | 84ETA | 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 290hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | 223in | ▲ MT665C+17 in · +8% |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 133in | ▲ MT665C+9 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 25,795lb | ▲ MT665C+6,245 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 26,460lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Challenger MT665C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 88th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 91st percentile (223 in)
A · MT665BB · MT665CMedian Agricultural Tractor