Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT665B vs Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT665B

Agricultural

power
290 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT665B specs
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B

Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Agricultural

power
335 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Xerion 3300 Trac specs
ChallengerChallenger MT665B
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300 Trac

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +45 hp (+16%)
MT665B290 hp
Xerion 3300 Trac335 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT665B is in the 93rd percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 96th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +24 ci (+5%)
MT665B513 ci
Xerion 3300 Trac537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT665B is in the 88th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT665B6
Xerion 3300 Trac6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT665B is in the 74th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +2,941 lb (+15%)
MT665B19,550 lb
Xerion 3300 Trac22,491 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT665B is in the 82nd percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 971 models

MT665B (A)Xerion 3300 Trac (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerChallengerClaas—
ModelMT665BXerion 3300 Trac—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerSisuCaterpillar—
Model84ETAC9—
Power Output290hp335hp▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+45 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,200RPM1,700RPM▲ MT665B+500 RPM · +29%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci537ci▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+24 ci · +5%
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypePower ShiftHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Length206in261in▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+55 in · +27%
Width118inNot recorded—
Height124in147in▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+23 in · +19%
Operating Weight19,550lb22,491lb▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+2,941 lb · +15%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
System TypeOpen CenterNot recorded—
Steering TypePower SteeringHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Chassis Type4x44x4 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePower SteeringHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeManual External Compression BandNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Starter TypeElectric StarterNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT665BClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 96th percentile (335 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,491 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 82nd percentile (206 in)B · 97th percentile (261 in)
A · MT665BB · Xerion 3300 TracMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT665BFull spec pageClaas Xerion 3300 Trac