Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665B
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665B vs Fendt 933
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 933
Agricultural
- power
- 288 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT665B
vs
FendtFendt 933
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT665B higher · +2 hp (<1%)MT665B290 hp
933288 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665B is in the 93rd percentile; 933 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 933 higher · +38 ci (+7%)MT665B513 ci
933551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665B is in the 88th percentile; 933 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665B6
9336
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665B is in the 74th percentile; 933 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 933 higher · +8,660 lb (+44%)MT665B19,550 lb
93328,210 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665B is in the 82nd percentile; 933 is in the 93rd · 971 models
MT665B (A)933 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT665B | 933 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | AGCO GmbH Johann Georg Fendt | — |
| Model | 84ETA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 288hp | ▲ MT665B+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT665B+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 551ci | ▲ 933+38 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 933+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | 130in | ▲ 933+6 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 28,210lb | ▲ 933+8,660 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Manual External Compression Band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665B | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (288 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 93rd percentile (28,210 lb)
Height
median 111 inA · 82nd percentile (124 in)B · 89th percentile (130 in)
A · MT665BB · 933Median Agricultural Tractor